In Classic Cases

The story of the ICJ’s Reparation for Injuries Advisory Opinion is made up of three parts, although the Court’s opinion concentrates on only one. This is the story of a Swedish diplomat and his death in 1948; a lost opportunity for Israeli-Arab relations; and the rise of the United Nations as a pivotal international organization. Count Folke Bernadotte’s murder was a tragedy because of his previous heroics. But the case before the ICJ as a consequence of that murder provided a critical link for the further development of international law.

Reparations for Injuries: Count Bernadotte

Count Folke Bernadotte of Wisburg, a relative of King Gustaf of Sweden, had rescued more than 30000 prisoners from German concentration camps in World War II through mediation. As vice-chairman of the Swedish Red Cross, he freed many Jews, but Bernadotte’s status of a hero among the Jewish people was short-lived. The newly formed United Nations had appointed Bernadotte as the mediator in the first Israeli-Arab conflict, with Israel fighting for independence. With his first partition plan, Bernadotte angered many extremist forces within Israel. He came to be seen as an enemy of Israel, and was assassinated in Jeruzalem at point blank range by the Jewish group LEHI. This group included Yitzhak Shamir, who would become Prime Minister of Israel in the 1980s. Count Bernadotte is now an icon in Swedish and diplomatic history.

Capacity to make a claim

Because Bernadotte was in the service of the United Nations, the new organization sought to improve security for its agents like Bernadotte. One avenue is the ability to hold someone or something responsible for injuries suffered by the organization or its agents, and extract reparations. Bu whether the UN was able to do so, like states, was unclear. The UN General Assembly (UNGA) asked the International Court of Justice for an advisory opinion on the issue. Did the UN have the capacity to make an international claim to demand reparations when a state is responsible for injuries to one of its agens in the performance of its duties? The question was asked in the abstract, but in essence, the UNGA asked whether the UN could make an international claim against Israel as the responsible government for the death of Count Bernadotte.

The requirements of international life

In order to answer the question, the Court had to basically determine the status of the UN in he international legal system in 1948? Is it on the same level as sovereign states? Does the UN have the international legal personality? Only if it does, can the UN make a claim. The court first determined that the subjects of law ’are not necessarily identical in nature or in the extent of their rights (…).’  That was the first opening. Besides states, other entities can be subjects of international law. The extent of their rights depends on the nature of those other entities, and ’their nature depends on the international community’. Legal pragmatism at its finest. And it gets better:

”Throughout its history, the development of international law has been influenced by the requirements of international life, and the progressive increase in the collective activities of States has already given rise to instances of action upon the international plane  by certain entities which are not States.”


But that still didn’t answer the question. The next step was an examination of the nature of the UN. First, the Court determined that the UN is a general organization with broad tasks and powers. What it concluded on that basis is worth quoting in full:

”In the opinion of the Court, the Organization was intended to exercise and enjoy, and is in fact exercising and enjoying, functions and rights which can only be explained on the basis of the possession of a large measure of international personality and the capacity to operate upon an international plane. (…) It must be acknowledged that its Members, by entrusting certain functions to it, with the attendant duties and responsibilities, have clothed it with the competence required to enable those functions to be effectively discharged.”

So, in order for the UN to be effective, the UN’s founders must have ’clothed it’ with legal personality, and so it has such legal personality. You can question whether the Court means to say that legal personality must be assumed in order to be effective, or that it must be assumed because the founder’s must have found it necessary to be effective. In any case, the Court was being pragmatic and idealistic at the same time.This principle of effectiveness has been with the law of international organizations ever since.


Count Bernadotte is not mentioned once in the Reparation for Injuries Opinion. But ultimately, Israel agreed to pay the United Nation 19.500 pounds, and did so in 1950. The family of Count Bernadotte did not file a claim against Israel, the assassins were never caught, and the Israeli-Arab conflict continues to this day. And the United Nations and international organizations in general became a permanent fixture in the international legal and political arenas.

Showing 18 comments
  • Kiki Brölmann

    Very nice entry Kenneth. Breaths new life in a classic decision. Compliments.

    • Kenneth Manusama

      Tx Kiki, glad to see you’re reading the blog… 😉

  • Jerry Ndyetabula

    Thanks Kenny. Thanks a lot for the good info. God bless u:-)

    • Kenneth Manusama

      Tx Jerry!

  • cyril

    i just read your article. thanks for making it accessible

    • Kenneth Manusama

      Tx, Cyril, good to hear there is some value in my work 😉 I hope you are doing well. Are you a student?

  • calvariana

    thankyou your blog really help me doing my task?

    • Kenneth Manusama

      You got it! Keep checking the blog 😉

  • mayank gautam

    very accurately mentioned 🙂
    i wil write this version in my semester exam 😀

  • Del logo

    Good work Kenneth, it has actually been helpful in my studies.

  • Haile

    Really Great! I will share this to my students.

  • Sas

    It’s very well orgniased for revision but there’s many spelling errors.
    Thanks for taking the time to project your knowledge to others!!

  • Anuj

    Very nice. I was actually looking for what happened after the reparations case. Could find it only here. I have one more question, if UN cannot bring an action for reparations in ICJ (because only states can be parties before the ICJ) how can UN actually effectively seek reparations in cases like these?

  • neecious

    is there difference between capacity and legal personality?

    • Kenneth Manusama

      Hi neeclous,

      Capacity is a necessary ‘ingredient’ for legal personality. However, what ‘capacity’ actually means is rather vague. Some see it as a factual thing that can be determined. Some, like me, see it more as an outcome of having all other ingredients, and a state or organization being recognized as a player on the international scene.

  • BeulahBiggie

    Hi admin, i’ve been reading your site for some time and
    I really like coming back here. I can see that you probably don’t make money on your blog.
    I know one simple method of earning money, I think you will like it.
    Search google for: dracko’s tricks

  • Maya

    Really Helpful, i’ll be needing your help for my upcoming Exam, hope can still in touch.

  • Yusuf

    Hi, thank you for your article. It was very beneficial for me. I also have a question. Can you explain differences between being subjects of international law and having legal personality?
    Is it possible to compare these two terms?

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact me

You can send me an email and I'll get back to you, asap.

Not readable? Change text. captcha txt
Nottebohm classic caseclassics barcelona traction