In Uncategorized

I thought I’d give you my two cents on the Brexit referendum that was held two days ago. All of the offered explanations for the Brexit have considerable merit, but disregard its root cause. I have seen some commentaries that casually mention it, but glance over it precisely because it is a root cause, and therefore ostensibly too big to solve. Whether it is the Brexit; the rise of Trump and other nationalist; or Islamic terrorism, globalization is the root cause: It’s globalization stupid!

Globalization and fear

In the Brexit campaign the issue of immigration loomed large, as were some other fact-free claims by the Leave-camp. To counter, the Remain-side predicted the doom of the British economy and influence in the world, and left it at that. Both sides used fear mongering. And that is symptomatic of all issues that find their roots in the effects, the implications of globalization. Present-day globalization is not just about spreading an economic system and prosperity by slashing trade barriers and connecting everyone through digital innovations. It is about the effects, or the lack thereof. Globalization fuels the fear of loss of identity; it fuels the prospect of economic insecurity; and globalization grows the perception that you cannot control your own destiny. Such fears are often fueled by the sense that the elites – political or otherwise – are deaf to the concerns of the population. So any counter argument by the elite is bound to raise the anger and the fear even further.

Globalization and those that get left behind

Although global prosperity has risen by and large, a majority of individuals that may be connected to the outside world through all kinds of different means have been unable to profit economically. It is a fact of life that a rising tide does not lift all boats, and one doesn’t have to read the work of Thomas Pikety realize that. However, in the West, the segment of society that gets left behind economically speaking overlaps with the white population that faces additional pressures from immigration (real or perceived). That segments feels its cultural anchor slowly coming loose, its identity being watered down by immigrants with other skin tones, different habits and religions.

In other regions of the world, unstable, authoritarian and/or ineffective regimes are often the cause unrest among the populations, because they block full participation in globalization. Hence the necessity of migrating to more prosperous and more peaceful parts of the world. Especially by the young, because often these countries and regions are disproportionately full with young, unemployed and restless kids; a demography that is reverse from what we experience in the West. For these youngsters, it is either get out or start a revolution, both of which are inherently dangerous and violent.

Globalization and the loss of control

All of the groups I spoke of above feel that they are not in control of their own destiny. They blame the elites and revolt against such elites in a number of different ways. In the UK, but also in other European countries and the United States, angry voters use democratic means to protest; the one thing they can control. The Brexit vote was as much a general desperate anti-elite vote, as it was an anti-European Union vote. I dare say that radical Islam and Islamic terrorism are a ’vote’ against this undermining of culture, economic stagnation and the lack of hope. In such times, an individual’s value system is determined by religion more so than in times of prosperity, like in Medieval Europe. When you’re poor and desperate and your world is changing rapidly, you will hold on to religion. In the extreme, terrorism may be the ultimate protest against globalization and the values that come with it. Yes, I do not believe that Islam as a religion is inherently more violent than Christianity ever was. You can call me naive, or whatever (just not an apologist).


Globalization is not about states or just about rising GDP. It is also about people. It has pitted young versus the old, white v. other colors, high v. low educated, haves v. have nots; secular v. religious. Islamic extremism, nationalist tendencies in Europe – including the Brexit, migration crises, and civil wars in the Middle East constitute a perfect storm created by globalization. Solutions? That’s for another day (spoiler alert: more globalization!). And that’s it for my musings on Brexit and globalization.

Showing 4 comments
  • doug marcus

    you would not have that argument except for 2007-2008 financial mess. joe paycheck works 40 hours, pays his taxes, saves a little, keeps his kids in school and obeys the law. the only thing he asks for return is security, opportunity and responsibility from those that are supposed to know more. post Lehman, post AIG, post FIFA, post Paris/Brussels/Orlando, post everything and the one guy shouldering it all is the guy not responsible for it. who in the group named above were fired, indicted, impoverished or jailed? due to a lack of accountability, the little guy sees zero possibility that we are in this together. screw it all, and screw you. I don’t agree with their means of channeling their anger but I get why they are angry.

    • Kenneth

      Doug, thanks for your comment. You describe exactly my point. Many people feel like they have no control, and that the people who you may think have control, don’t have control either. Because of globalization. So I get why they are angry: they feel powerless. Plus, it is not just economics. Globalization means more freedom of movement for persons and ideas, which makes people very uncomfortable. We all want to be able to identify with how people in our immediate surroundings look, think, and what they value. That desire is threatened by globalization.

  • doug marcus

    lets talk about immigration. usa is a nation of immigrants that has had it spells of nativism but those were short lived. since 99% of the population are from immigrant stock, it is the great american narrative that says “just like my grandpa, came over here with nothing but worked hard, learned the language, and became a citizen. as his grandson i own a home, my kids are in college, life is good because he left the old country and risked it all to come here.” americans of every stripe love that narrative, it may sound like hokum to a non american, but it is what kept the stank of populism and nativism marginalize to a few crazies out there. the open borders regimes appears to require nothing in return to live here – rather than assimilating into the american, there is a state within a state, its no longer an ethnic community like little italy or the upper east side, but a perceived no go zone where american values are dismissed, derided and we want to live here like we used to live back there. where is the citizenship, where is the obligation, where is the responsibility that we expect from our immigrant brethren? i don’t subscribe to that philosophy but i know why they say it. people just run across the border without limit or inspection, it raises suspicion, it creates anger because immigrant magnet cities just can’t afford it and the national government seems powerless or indifferent. i find it wrong that an american voting ballot is now written in english and spanish..why not yiddish, or greek or martian? come to my country with your work ethic and desire for freedom, no religious test required, and gain citizenship and let your family flourish. but just drop yourself without even going through the legal process that allows you to live here is what makes an undocumented resident an illegal alien in the eyes of many.

  • Kenneth Manusama

    Doug, indeed, it’s about one’s identity and the identity of a nation. Thanks for your insights.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact me

You can send me an email and I'll get back to you, asap.

Not readable? Change text. captcha txt
Justice Breyer The Court and the Worldchilcot political accountability